Bu sefer de ileri teknoloji urunler/Nanolex Pro v Zaino Z2 v G-techniq C1
Baktim, bu testlere ilgi buyuk forumda, bir de bunlara bakin.
Nanolex Pro v Zaino Z2 v G-techniq C1
Nanolex Pro v Zaino Z2 v G-techniq C1 - Detailing World
Zaino Z2 in ben nano teknolociyim diye bir iddiasi yok ama ozellikle detailingworld de cok begenilen ve bu urunlerle ayni sinifa koyulan bir premium sealant.
Uzun uzun cevirme ve her resmi anlatamayacagim, benim icin onemli olanlar
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e1...I/IMG_3525.jpg
1. boncuklanma
-Gtechniq
super gercekten
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e1...I/IMG_3559.jpg
- Nanolex
uniform degil, sekiller eh..
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e1...I/IMG_3561.jpg
- Zaino
gtechniq den bir tik geride, ama yakisikli
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e1...I/IMG_3556.jpg
durum asagidaki gibi soldan saga
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e1...I/IMG_3549.jpg
================================================== ==
Onemli yerleri ceviriyorum sadece
4 ay sonraki update e bakalim
Update- Sunday 4 July 2010- 4 month update.
So here is an update almost 4 months after intial application.
A couple of reasons for the delay:
- no real differnce was noticable until recently in beading and sheeting
- becasue i used a flat panel, the dirt repellancy couldnt be measured (should really have done test on a vertical door panel to tst this)
- I'm confused as to what i ** supposed to be looking for- thus, all comments very welcome and appreciated.
RECAP: C1 on left, Z2 in centre, Nanolex on right.
Beading
- all three bead equally poorly. All beads are a about the size of a 5 pence piece, spaced quite far apart. This is to be expected as they are sealants and beading isn't one of their characteristics as it is with carnuba based products. I have to say I ** slightly surprised how the C1 stopped beading. It was only a couple of weeks after application that those lovely beads you see above disapeared.
Boncuklanma- Hic biri dogru durust boncuklanma yapamiyor, zaten karasteristikleri de bu degil.
Sheeting
(net birsey soyleyemiyor)
- here is where my own confusion comes in. Because sealants are not know for their beading, in the past I have tested their competence on their sheting ability. To me, this signifies their ability to repel water, and thus dirt. However, with the introduciton of AQartz and JJ's testing, manufactures (Mr AQartz and Mr G|techniq mainly) have come out stating that sheetings and beading are not the main characterisitics of 'protection.' This, leads me to my next heading...
Ease of Cleaning
(temizlik hala cok kolay )
- ah, not the best test for this with hindsight. The bonnet, a vertical panel, never really gets very dirty, so all 2 priducts are equally easy to clean, with just a quick wipe with a mitt required.
Scratch Resistance
Cizi dayanimi, gtechniq bu konuda super, ama bu araba o kadar iyi yikaniyor ki zaten hic biri cizilmedi
- the G|techniq in particlurat boasts scratch resistance properties. unfortunately, due to DW, my (an my father's) wash technique is near perfect and there is not a single swirl on the paint.
Photos describing my only real finding on the particular disparities in the product's characteristics.
Tek fark, sheeting/su kaydirma de ortaya cikiyor, gtechniq super yapiyor, zaino birazcik gerisinde ve nanolex sonuncu . Ayrica nanolex olan yerde su damlasi kalmiyor, fakat digerlerinde bir kac damla kaliyor..
- as is clearly seen, is is the sheeting that seperates the products.
- C1 sheets 10 times quicker than the others, with Z2 slowly behind and the Nanolex last. (the Nanolex was previously close behind the C1).
sol gtechniq orta zaino sag nanolex, resimde gozuktugu gibi, gtechniq burada eziyor,zaino2, nanolex 3
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e1...I/IMG_3995.jpg
Zaino hala azicik boncuklanma yapiyor, gteechniq de, nanolex hic su artigi birakmiyor..
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e1...I/IMG_4002.jpg
ps:bunlarin adi nano degil, sealaaant, nano yazani banlarim
