sanırım bu konuda bazı arkadaşları artık okula geri gitmesi gerektiğini anlatacak en güzel açıklama geldi.
daha güzel ve doyurucu olamazdı herhalde: :)
http://www.cartoq.com/advantages-and...-a-4-cylinder/
lütfen okuyunuz, çeviriniz neymiş, ne değilmiş sizinmi hocanız sıkıntılı yoksa bizimkimi mühendis bey :) daha fazla dediğim doğru daha fazla siz yanlış olamazdınız herhalde :) ama bende sıkıntı :)
Disadvantages
Not refined
A four-cylinder engine would be much smoother sounding than a three cylinder engine. That’s because a normal internal combustion engine is a four stroke cycle – intake, compression, combustion and exhaust (suck, squeeze, bang, blow). So at any point in time in a four-cylinder engine, there is one cylinder that is always on the power stroke (combustion) in the cycle. In a three-cylinder engine there is a difference in the way the pistons are arranged on the crankshaft, which leads to a delay of half a cycle between power strokes. In a three-cylinder engine a power stroke happens after every 120 degree rotation of the crankshaft, while in a four-cylinder engine it happens with every 90 degree rotation of the crankshaft (for one full 360 degree rotation of the flywheel). This shows up as a slight gap in the firing time, and hence a rougher engine note.